E-Rate Central
E-Rate Central Home E-Rate Central Services E-Rate Application Tips E-rate Forms Rack E-rate National and State Specific Information E-rate Service Provider Information E-rate Archives: News, Bulletins, CIPA, FCC, Terminology, Code9Contact Us
Resources > FCC > Appeal Decisions
Sort by:
date
relevancy
Help

 

FCC Orders & Appeals
CIPA
Code 9
Terminology
News
Bulletins
Links

 

Receive the
E-rate Weekly
Newsletter

 

 
Appeal Decisions
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next >>

Useful interpretations of E-rate program rules are often provided in FCC orders resulting from applicant appeals of SLD funding decisions.

Key FCC appeal decisions, organized by topic, are provided in the table below. A full list, organized by release date, is available on the FCC Web site.

Category / Subject Decision Summary FCC Reference
& Release Date
Name
Appeal Process. Admission of new information on appeal. New information may not be admitted to contradict earlier information, but can be admitted to clarify or resolve an ambiguity. DA 04-308
2/6/2004
 
470: Competitive Bids. Complaint by losing vendor re. price Denied: Lowest priced bid need not be selected. FCC 99-216
8/11/1999
 
470: Competitive Bids. Complaint by losing vendor re. RFP Denied: No E-rate requirement for public RFP. DA 99-2408
11/2/1999
 
470: Competitive Bids. Vendor listed as contact on Form 470 Invalidates Form 470 and associated Form 471s FCC 00-167
5/23/2000
MasterMind
470: Posting. Need to post tariffed services for 28 days Tariff is not a pre-existing contract. DA 99-1335
7/6/1999
 
471: Contracts. Evidence of contract Bids or verbal agreements are not contracts. DA 99-1506
7/29/1999
 
471: Contracts. Signing date Contracts must be signed on or after the allowable contract date established by the Form 470. DA 99-2534
11/16/1999
 
471: Contracts. Vendor contract "irregularities" Permitted re-filing of applications denied as a result of vendor problems unknown to applicants. FCC 00-260
8/11/2000
 
 
471: Contracts. Voluntary extensions and/or renewals Renewal terms, in contracts based on valid Form 470s, can be exercised without further posting. Extensions should be "memorialized." DA 99-1773
9/1/1999

DA 02-2975
11/4/2002

 
471: Correction of requested funding amount. Block 5 amount too low Correction requests to increase the amount of funding must be disallowed. DA 02-3159
11/18/2002
 
471: Dismissal for inadequate certifications. SLD dismissal of an entire 471 application Upholds (with one exception for basic phone service) SLD's practice of denying all funding based on inaccurate or inadequate certifications. FCC 00-2
1/4/2000
United Talmudical
471: Dismissal for inadequate resources (Item 25 reviews). SLD dismissal of entire 471 applications Upholds SLD's Item 25 review process requiring showing of necessary resources by individual applicants or consortiums. DA 01-853
4/5/2001

DA 01-855
4/9/2001

 
471: Dismissal for minor errors and late filings. SLD denial of entire applications Waived rules for procedural, not substantive, violations.  Instruct SLD to revise review procedures. FCC 06-54
5/19/2006
Bishop Perry
471: Dismissal for "pattern analysis" of Form 470s.  SLD denial of entire groups of applications. Denials based solely on pattern analysis procedures, not supported by additional investigations, are improper. FCC 06-55
5/19/2006
 
471: Dismissal for minor errors. SLD dismissal of entire 471 applications Remand to SLD for reconsideration involving certain minor errors where correct information could be deduced from other data provided. FCC 01-73
2/22/2001
Naperville
471: Existing Contracts Chosen after Form 470 Posting    If there is an existing contract that was not signed pursuant to a posted Form 470, an applicant may post a Form 470, evaluate all bids, and choose the existing contract as the most cost-effective offer and then apply for discounts on that contract. DA 02-2975
11/4/2002
Kalamazoo
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next >>
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
© 1998-2008 CentralEd TM All Rights Reserved