Upcoming 2016 E-Rate Deadlines:
October 28 |
The invoice deadline for recurring service charges for FY 2015 is this Friday. Applicants planning to file for BEAR reimbursements need (1) an active PIN, and (2) an approved Form 498. Completion of either of these two steps can easily take two or more weeks. Additionally, before BEARs can be filed, applicants must make sure that the service providers associated with each BEAR have themselves filed their Service Provider Annual Certifications (Form 473s) for FY 2015.
If BEARs cannot be filed by the October 28th deadline, applicants must file IDERs on or before this date. Late IDERs, regardless of reason, are now being routinely denied by the FCC.
For details, please see our newsletter of September 12th, the Schools and Libraries News Brief of October 14, 2016, and the discussion above of USAC’s new IDER tool.
|
October 31 |
The Form 486 deadline for FY 2016 funding committed in Waves 1–2 is next Monday. More generally, the Form 486 deadline is 120 days from the FCDL date or the service start date (often July 1st), whichever is later. This means that Form 486 deadlines for funding commitments received in later waves will follow at roughly one week intervals, including the following November deadlines:
Wave 3 11/07/2016
Wave 4 11/14/2016
Wave 5 11/21/2016
Wave 6 11/28/2016
|
November 3 |
The FCC deadline for submitting comments on the Boulder Valley and Microsoft petitions regarding off-campus use of existing E-rate supported connectivity (see DA 16-1051 and our newsletter of September 26th). |
T-Mobile’s “Homework Gap” Settlement:
The FCC reached a settlement agreement with T-Mobile last week addressing “inadequate disclosures of ‘unlimited’ data plan restrictions.” The most interesting aspect of the settlement is a requirement for T-Mobile to provide free student devices and low cost Internet wireless support for up to 80,000 students beginning next fall. A specific goal of the “Investment in Youth Program,” as set forth in the Order (DA 16-1125), is to “bridge the homework gap.”
Student provisions:
- Devices (e.g., tablets) and wireless Internet services to the students (and their families) will be free.
- The actual devices are intended to be valued in a range of $80–200 (as selected by the school).
- The wireless service must include 2 GB of data per month at the highest speed offered by the local T-Mobile network (followed by reduced speed for the remainder of the monthly cycle).
- The students receiving free devices and services will apparently be selected by the participating schools.
- The Internet service must be filtered to “comply” with CIPA. (Note: Because the Internet will be provided by T-Mobile, not through the school, it is not immediately clear how CIPA compliance will be determined — and by whom.)
School and/or school district provisions:
- School participation is limited to those with a student population of 40% or greater enrolled in the free and reduced lunch program (and where T-Mobile has 4G LTE coverage over at least 80% of the school’s geographic enrollment zone).
- Participating schools must commit to train relevant teachers and administrators in how best to utilize the devices and the wireless service. T-Mobile must provide “reasonable and appropriate training and technical assistance to the schools free of charge.”
- Although monthly service is free to the students, the cost to the schools (presumably not E-rate eligible) is set at $10/student/month. Upon request, schools may qualify for a waiver of the monthly service charges.
FCC Decision Watch:
The FCC granted appeals for 69 applicants whose funding had been reduced as the result of late-filed Form 486s. The appeals, filed as early as mid-2013, covered FY 2009 through FY 2015.
To review: The normal deadline for filing a Form 486 is 120 days from the later of (a) the start of service (typically July 1st), or (b) the funding commitment date. If a Form 486 is filed late, USAC will reset the service start date to one calculated as 120 days before the actual filing date, and will adjust any recurring service funding commitment amount accordingly, even to zero.
The good news for applicants affected by last week’s Order (DA 16-1205) is that their funding will be restored. The bad news for everyone is that the FCC took this opportunity revisit its approach to granting relief for late Form 486s going forward, specifically for appeals filed with either USAC or the FCC after January 30, 2017.
Thereafter, the FCC ruled that “…absent extraordinary circumstances, we will only grant appeals of USAC decisions denying or reducing funding for late-filed FCC Forms 486 where petitioners have 1) sought an extension of the FCC Form 486 deadline no more than 120 days after the last day to receive the E-rate supported service at issue, and 2) demonstrated good cause justifying the late submission of the FCC Forms 486.”
The FCC based its decision to tighten the appeal deadline on the need to make unused funds available to other applicants. This is the same rationale it used to restrict grants of IDERs after the initial invoice deadline.
In actuality, tying the Form 486 appeal deadline to 120 days after the last date to receive service (the end of the funding year for recurring services) is stricter than the IDER deadline because invoice deadlines, in the case of late FCDLs, may be later than that. Under the new rule, late-funded applicants will have to be particularly careful not to miss their Form 486 deadlines. Note also the FCC’s use of the phrase “absent extraordinary circumstances,” the same language the FCC is now applying to late-filed IDERs. We have seen no recent examples of circumstances that the FCC has considered “extraordinary.”
Last week’s order is but another step in the FCC’s move to tighten E-rate deadlines — another cautionary lesson for E-rate applicants.
USAC Fall Training Schedule:
The locations and dates for USAC’s remaining regional trainings are listed below. For registration information, see Trainings & Outreach.
• |
San Juan, PR |
Thursday, October 27, 2016 |
• |
Minneapolis, MN |
Tuesday, November 1, 2016 (waiting list only) |
• |
St. Louis, MO |
Thursday, November 10, 2016 (waiting list only) |
• |
Seattle, WA |
Wednesday, November 16, 2016 (waiting list only) |
• |
Los Angeles, CA |
Friday, November 18, 2016 (waiting list only) |
Slides for the Minneapolis training have been posted on the USAC website.
FCC Decision Watch:
The FCC issued its latest monthly set of “streamlined,” precedent-based decisions in Public Notice DA 16-112. In summary, the FCC:
- Dismissed
- Nine Petitions for Reconsideration, including one second petition, not identifying additional reasons or not being submitted within the 30-day filing reconsideration window.
- Granted
- Two requests for review regarding entity eligibility for network circuits traversing non-school locations. The FCC ruled that “…although a transmission route to serve an eligible entity passed through an ineligible entity, the service was eligible because the ineligible entity did not use any of the discounted service.”
- One request for review, on a 10-year old appeal, involving the distinction between Priority 1 and Priority 2 equipment located on an applicant’s premises. Note that the FCC’s Eligible Services List for FY 2017 provides much greater clarity on the Category 1 and Category 2 classification of services within a single building or campus (see our newsletter of September 19th).
- Two requests for a waiver of the Form 471 filing deadline for applications filed within 14 days of the close of the window.
- Three requests for waiver of the Form 471 filing deadline, due to “circumstances beyond the applicant’s control,” filed 15 days or longer after the close of the window. In all three cases, the “circumstances” involved specific, and well-documented problems (including customer service case numbers), with USAC’s EPC system.
- One request for review of a signed contract requirement.
- One request for waiver of the technology plan rule (no longer in effect).
- One request for review of the 28-day competitive bidding rule deemed misapplied as the result of a clerical error on the Form 471.
- One request for review, partially granted, regarding the eligibility of a firewall bundle including ineligible anti-virus and anti-spam components. The FCC directed USAC, with the petitioner’s help, to review the funding request, remove the ineligible costs, and process the eligible portion.
- Denied
- Two requests for waiver of the cost-effectiveness analysis required to support wireless data plans or air cards.
- One request for review, again on a 10-year old appeal, involving the fine line distinction between eligible and ineligible firewall services.
- One request for review of the eligibility of entities providing after-school and summer camp education as a part of a public-private partnership with public schools.
- Seven more waiver requests for invoice deadline extensions.
- Seven requests for waivers of the Form 471 deadline for applications filed more than 14 days late.
- Two requests for review and/or waiver of the 28-day competitive bidding rule.
- Two late-filed requests for review or waiver.
USAC Fall Training Schedule:
The locations and dates for USAC’s regional trainings are listed below. For registration information, see Trainings & Outreach.
• |
Buena Vista, FL |
Thursday, October 6, 2016 |
• |
Houston, TX |
Friday, October 14, 2016 |
• |
Philadelphia, PA |
Tuesday, October 18, 2016 |
• |
Minneapolis, MN |
Tuesday, November 1, 2016 |
• |
St. Louis, MO |
Thursday, November 10, 2016 |
• |
Seattle, WA |
Wednesday, November 16, 2016 |
• |
Los Angeles, CA |
Friday, November 18, 2016 (waiting list only) |
Slides for the Florida training have been posted on the USAC website.