As the government shutdown continues, one potentially devastating impact, on low-income families, is the termination of benefits from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (“SNAP”) that occurred on November 1st. Although twenty-five states have filed suit to temporarily extend the program using existing contingency funds, and with the support already from two federal courts, there is no assurance that this move will succeed.
The loss of SNAP benefits during the shutdown is not an E-Rate problem but it does highlight an underlying aspect of the shutdown that would affect some E-Rate applicants. The 2025 budget reconciliation bill, stalled in Congress and at the heart of the shutdown, proposes sweeping reductions — approximately $287 billion over ten years — in the SNAP program by tightening eligibility criteria. If enacted, as currently proposed, the number of families eligible for SNAP benefits would be reduced by millions.
Reduced family participation in SNAP would, in turn and over time, reduce school-reported Identified Student Percentage (“ISP”) ratios, the major criteria for participation in the Community Eligibility Provision (“CEP”) program.* Lower ISP ratios would have a direct impact on the number of schools eligible for CEP. This would have a potentially rippling effect on school discount rates in two ways.
- For schools remaining eligible for CEP, ISP ratios determine the schools’ National School Lunch Program (“NSLP”) percentages, the key determinant of E-Rate discount rates. NSLP percentages are currently calculated at 1.6x times the ISP ratios (assuming the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) maintains that multiplier). Lower ISPs will, in some cases, drop schools into a lower discount rate band.
- Worse still, lower ISP ratios may disqualify some schools from CEP altogether. Should this occur, the schools would have no choice other than to return to the time-consuming family survey method to calculate their discount rate-determining NSLP percentages.
The only partially good news under a declining ISP scenario is that a school’s CEP participation, and its associated ISP, is fixed for a four-year term. The negative impact on a school’s ISP ratio, CEP participation, associated NSLP percentage, and E-Rate discount should not be realized for another 1-3 years.