Upcoming 2018 E-Rate Dates:
September 7 |
Last day of the PIA summer deferral period. Application reviews placed on hold during this period will be reactivated. |
September 10 |
FY 2017 Form 486 deadline for funding committed in Wave 54. Other upcoming Form 486 deadlines include:
Wave 55 09/12/2018
Wave 56 10/26/2018
Wave 57 11/26/2018
Applicants missing these (or earlier) deadlines should watch carefully for “Form 486 Urgent Reminder Letters” in EPC. The Reminders will afford applicants with 15-day extensions to submit their Form 486s without penalty.
The first Form 486 deadline for FY 2018 is not until October 29, 2018.
|
September 10 |
Deadline to submit comments on the Department of Agriculture’s Rural Utilities Service proposal for the implementation of its $600 million pilot broadband program (e-Connectivity Pilot). Coincidentally, this is the same deadline for the submission of comments on the FCC’s $100 million pilot broadband telehealth program (FCC 18-112). Neither pilot program is directly related to E-rate, but both are designed to promote broadband in rural areas. |
September 13 |
Deadline to submit reply comments on the FCC’s Proposed Eligible Services List for FY 2019 (DA 18-789). |
September 19 |
USAC webinar entitled Navigating the E-rate Invoicing Process. |
September 30 |
Service Delivery Deadline (“SDD”) for FY 2017 non-recurring FRNs. This is also the deadline for requesting a one-year SDD extension (see USAC News Brief referenced below). |
Public Comments on the Eligible Services List for FY 2019:
The State E-Rate Coordinators’ Alliance (“SECA”) was the only party filing substantial comments to the FCC’s Proposed Eligible Services List (“ESL”) for FY 2019 (DA 18-789). SECA’s comments suggested clarifications to several aspects on the ESL including:
- A definition of eligible Category 1 Network Equipment sufficient to cover all components (leased or purchased) necessary to integrate Leased Lit fiber circuits into a fully functional network.
- Proper Form 471 treatment of Category 2 software which is listed separately in the ESL, but not included as a subcategory in the Form 470.
- Guidance on the categorization of client licenses.
- Confirmation that leased equipment may be categorized under either Internal Connections (“IC”) or Managed Internal Broadband Services (“MIBS”).
More broadly, with respect to Category 2, SECA noted the understandable confusion of applicants as to the proper classification of equipment maintenance as either Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections (“BMIC”), IC, or MIBS — a distinction initially, but no longer required, to implement the previous 2/5 rule for Priority 2 equipment. SECA recommended the elimination of the Category 2 subcategories.
FCC Decision Watch:
The FCC has issued another set of “streamlined,” precedent-based decisions (DA 18-897). Applicants facing similar problems as addressed in these decisions may garner useful information by carefully reading the additional FCC explanations found in the footnotes. The original appeal and waiver requests can be found online in the FCC’s Search for Filings.
In last week’s decisions, the FCC:
- Dismissed:
- Three Requests for Review and/or Waiver deemed moot for which USAC had already taken the actions requested or for which the applicants had already been fully compensated.
- Granted:
- One Request for Review, originally filed in 2001, waiving the FCC’s 30% rule and remanding the application to USAC for review.
- One Request for Review giving an applicant additional time to respond to USAC’s requests for information.
- Two Requests for Waiver for ministerial and/or clerical errors on Form 471 applications or in responses to PIA questions.
- One Request for Waiver of the appeal- or waiver-filing deadline for an applicant filing such a request “only a few days late.”
- Denied:
- Four Requests for Waiver of invoice deadline extensions.
- Six Requests for Waiver for applications filed more than two weeks after the close of the FY 2018 window.
- One Request for Review for ministerial and/or clerical “errors” for which the petitioner had not demonstrated good cause to justify changes to its E-rate application.
- One Request for Review, originally filed in 2000, of a denied service substitution.
- Three Requests for Waiver for untimely-filed waivers or appeals.