FCC Confirms Community Use of On-Premise Wi-Fi:
With many schools and libraries now closed, and schools moving to online classes, questions have arisen as to the E-rate implications of continuing to operate Wi-Fi systems to provide community access to Internet services in parking lots or other nearby locations. In 2010, the FCC’s Sixth Report and Order (FCC 10-175) specifically authorized the use of E-rate funded services to “community members who access the Internet while on a school’s campus” during “non-operating hours.” The Order was silent with respect to after-hours community use of library Internet services. In the current environment, both schools and libraries sought clarification on the E-rate eligibility of community Internet use when their facilities were technically closed.
On March 23rd, the FCC confirmed that community use of E-rate-supported Wi-Fi networks is permitted during school and library closures due to the COVID-19 pandemic (DA 20-234). The FCC’s confirmation explicitly expressed the “hope that this reminder will promote connectivity to Americans impacted by the disruption caused by the coronavirus pandemic.” Given the FCC’s apparent accommodation, some schools and libraries have or are planning steps to further expand community and student Internet resources by increasing bandwidth, adding higher-powered WAPs to the exterior of their buildings, or perhaps linking to mobile hotspots throughout their communities. It is by no means clear that the FCC is prepared to be this flexible. Indeed, a footnote to last week’s Public Notice reminds readers of the original community use provision stating that schools “may not request funding for more services than are necessary for educational purposes to serve their current student population.” It should also be noted that the community use permission specifically refers to use on a “school’s campus.”
In our view, one reasonable approach to these E-rate cautions is to ignore them. Whatever steps are necessary to provide necessary Internet capability to students and patrons during this crisis should be done — regardless of short-term E-rate funding considerations that the FCC may ultimately change or waive. Planning to ask for forgiveness is far preferable to waiting for permission.
School and Library CARES’ Funding:
The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act does not include $2 billion in funding for the FCC’s E-rate program that was included in an earlier U.S. House version of the bill.* Instead, the CARES Act provides $30.75 billion (through September 30, 2021) in emergency relief funds for the U.S. Department of Education (“USDOE”). Of that, approximately $13.5 billion would be used for ?K-12 emergency relief grants and an additional $3.5 billion would be reserved for governors to use and distribute based on local need.
As we currently understand the Act, funds allocated to the states would have to be distributed by USDOE within a month of receiving state applications. The states, for their part, would be charged with distributing 90% of funds to local LEAs in proportion to their most recent year’s allocation under Part A of Title 1 of ESEA. Use of funds is broadly defined under ESEA but does include planning and coordination for “providing technology for online learning to all students” and for “purchasing educational technology (including hardware, software, and connectivity) for students.”
On the library side, the Act includes a $50 million grant (also through September 30, 2021) to the Institute of Museum and Library Services (“IMLS”) “to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the coronavirus, including grants to States, territories and tribes to expand digital network access, purchase internet accessible devices, and provide technical support services.”
If additional emergency legislation is enacted, hopefully it might include school and library funding directly to the FCC, either generally or through E-rate, to support equipment and services for remote learning.
Deferral of PIA Responses:
With many E-rate contacts working from home and without easy access to necessary application and/or invoicing documentation, there has been considerable concern about missing PIA response deadlines. USAC’s News Brief of March 13th briefly noted an FCC directive to provide all applicants with automatic 14-day extensions to respond to PIA inquiries — an extra extension that apparently could not easily be formally incorporated within EPC’s deadline reporting system.
With the COVID-19 crisis deepening, it has become clear that even a fourteen-day extension is insufficient. We were heartened, therefore, to hear USAC’s assurances last week that no applications (or invoices) would be denied during the crisis for failure to meet PIA deadlines. PIA reviewers have apparently been instructed to lay aside applications with no responses and to move onto other applications. In a sense, USAC has effectively initiated an early start to the summer deferment process.
By late last week, we began to see how the more flexible deferral policy will play out within EPC. As shown in the following EPC notice, USAC has created a new “Disaster 15-Day” outreach type with language asking applicants to notify their reviewers if they are unable to respond. Whenever possible, we encourage applicants to respond to PIA inquiries in a timely fashion so as the maximize the likelihood of early funding commitments for FY 2020.
Other Potential Accommodations for Applicants:
Last week, in a move that might predict similar provisions for E-rate applicants, the FCC on its own motion approved additional pandemic relief for Rural Health Care (“RHC”) participants. The Order (DA 20-345) provided the following:
- Extended the FY 2020 application window deadline to late June.
- Permitted the extension of evergreen contracts set to expire in FY 2019 through FY 2020.
- Extended the response deadline for USAC information requests.
- Waived the FY 2019 service delivery deadline, extending it for another year.
- Extended the invoice filing deadline by an additional 160 days.
- Extended the appeal and waiver deadlines by an additional 60 days.
Hopefully the FCC will provide similar accommodations for E-rate participants.