Last week’s newsletter of April 24th and the newsletter of April 17th, discussed a series of questions sent to applicants who filed for special construction of lit, dark, or self-provisioned fiber. The initial deadline to submit responses to these questions is Monday, May 1, 2017.
If you are unable to respond to the inquiry by Monday May 1, 2017, submit a request for an extension to SL-SETeam@usac.org. In submitting a request for an extension you should indicate why an extension is needed, such as waiting for information from the vendor. USAC should automatically grant a seven day extension, but other extensions will be harder to get. However, we suspect USAC will grant additional extensions as long as the applicant is working in good faith to respond to the inquiries. If a second extension is needed we strongly encourage you to provide a partial response to the questions to demonstrate your good faith effort. As with any extension request, you should ask for confirmation that the extension has been granted by USAC.
We have heard of several instances where applicants have requested extensions from USAC, but have not received confirmation that the extension has been granted. With the deadline on Monday this is very disconcerting for these applicants. We are hopeful USAC will announce that any requested extensions will be granted, especially with less than two weeks to go in the FY 2017 filing window.
Finally, we have heard that some applicants receiving lit fiber through regulated companies are unable to provide some of the information requested in the inquiry because their service providers claim the customer information would violate the FCC’s own requirements regarding sharing Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI). These regulated carriers are also concerned that the inquiries are asking for confidential pricing and costing information that, understandably, they are hesitant to share with applicants. One low cost solution to this problem is for the FCC or USAC, as the regulatory agency over these service providers, to work directly with the service providers to get the information they believe they need. This would work better than forcing applicants into the uncomfortable position of trying to get sensitive information from their service providers.