Upcoming Dates:
November 3 –
November 7 |
USAC announced that EPC will be unavailable to all users from November 3rd at 11:59 p.m. through November 7th at 9:00 a.m. as the FCC transitions the BEAR invoice filing process from its old legacy system into EPC. The FCC has extended any EPC deadlines between October 31st and November 7th to November 8th.
Reminder: Once this transition is complete, Account Administrators should review the BEAR filing permissions in EPC to make sure that the correct BEAR filer(s) is authorized. Last December, USAC carried legacy system permissions into EPC, but any new BEAR permissions established in the legacy system so far in 2023 will have to be reestablished in EPC.
|
November 10 |
Revised due date (DA 23-852) for reply comments on the FCC’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FCC 23-65) on cybersecurity labeling for internet devices (see our newsletter of August 14th). |
November 20 |
Nominations are due for a Tribal Board member on the USAC Board of Directors (see DA 23-903). |
November 24 |
Due date for additional comments on the proposed Eligible Services List (“ESL”) (DA 23-1011) for FY 2024 regarding the eligibility of Wi-Fi on school buses. There is no provision for additional reply comments. |
FCC Streamlined Decisions:
The FCC issued another set of “streamlined” precedent-based (DA 23-1007) last week. As with past streamlined decisions, applicants facing similar problems as those addressed in these decisions may garner useful information by carefully reading the additional FCC explanations found in the footnotes. The original appeal and/or waiver requests can be found online in the FCC’s Search for Filings under Docket 02-6 (E-rate) or Docket 21-93 (ECF).
In October’s streamlined decisions, the FCC:
- E-Rate Dismissed:
- One filing for failure to comply with the FCC’s general filing requirements.
- Three Petitions for Reconsideration for failure to identify any material error, omission, or reason warranting reconsideration.
- E-Rate Granted:
- One Request for Review in which the FCC disagreed with USAC’s discount rate calculation.
- Four Requests for Review remanded to USAC for discount, duplicative services, or entity validation issues.
- One Petition for Reconsideration for late-filed Form 471 applications.
- One Petition for Reconsideration for a waiver of the appeal filing deadline.
- One Request for Review for an incorrect Form 486 service start date.
- One Request for Review for a late-filed Form 486.
- Thirteen Requests for Review and/or Waiver for ministerial and/or clerical errors involving Form 471 applications or invoicing.
- One Request for Waiver of the Red Light Rule “given the grossly disproportion penalty of funding loss.”
- One Request for Waiver of the special construction service delivery deadline.
- E-Rate Denied:
- One Request for Review on a discount rate calculation.
- One Request for Review for duplicative services.
- One Request for Review for failure to file a form 470 for the current funding year.
- Two Requests for Review on ineligible services.
- Twelve Requests for Waiver on late-filed Form 471 applications failing to present extraordinary circumstances justifying waivers.
- Two Requests for Waiver for late-filed invoices or invoice deadline extension requests.
- One Request for Waiver for ministerial and/or clerical errors.
- Two Review and/or Waiver for Form 470s that did not seek bids on the types of services later requested.
- Nine Requests for Waiver for untimely filed appeals or waiver requests.
- ECF Granted:
- Two Requests for Waiver involving the early delivery of equipment.
- One Request for Review and/or Waiver granting extra time to respond to USAC’s request for information.
- One Request for Review and/or Waiver for ministerial and/or clerical errors.
- One Request for Review and/or Waiver involving payment verification.
- Two Requests for Waiver of the service delivery date.
- ECF Denied:
- One Request for Waiver and/or Review for untimely filed appeals or waiver requests.
Electronic Cybersecurity Label Update:
As discussed in our newsletterof September 25th, the FCC is proposing to institute a “U.S. Cyber Trust Mark” program to help consumers identify trustworthy internet devices such as laptops and cellphones that meet certain cybersecurity standards. The program, as proposed, would identify such devices only with printed labels that would be useful, in our view, only at the point of purchase.
E-Rate Central filed initial comments in this proceeding encouraging the FCC to extend its labeling proposal beyond printed labels to incorporate electronic device “labels” that could be “read” by the systems to which these devices seek to be connected. We believe that adding this capacity would enhance cybersecurity protections for schools and libraries with BYOD (Bring Your Own Devices) policies whose systems are open to student- or patron-owned devices. Two other parties — the Information Technology Industry Council (“ITI”) and the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (“NEMA”) — made similar suggestions.
Last week, E-Rate Central filed reply comments referencing the ITI and NEMA comments. We again argued that, if the FCC is going to spend significant time and resources to develop a printed cyber-labeling system for devices, the program could be dramatically enhanced by adding an electronic labeling component.
The deadline for filing cyber-labeling reply comments is this Friday, November 10th. We would hope that schools and libraries supporting an expanded electronic labeling option join us in submitting comments. Even simple FCC express comments supporting the ITI, NEMA, and E-Rate Central positions would be helpful.
Express “REPLY TO COMMENTS,” if only a sentence or two, can be filed in this proceeding by completing a simple form with text boxes on the FCC’s “Submit a FILING” site, specifying “23-239” as the proceeding number on the first line.