Moving forward on another of Chairwoman Rosenworcel’s "Learn without Limits" initiatives, the FCC released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ("NPRM") last week to provide E-rate funding for Wi-Fi hotspots and services for students and library patrons without access to internet at home. The NPRM (FCC 23-91), if and when adopted, could provide extended services into some of the same homes previously being funded by the Emergency Connectivity Fund ("ECF") program that is expiring on June 30, 2024. Unlike ECF, however, E-rate funding will be at the school’s or library’s regular discount rate, not at a 100% reimbursement level. It is also clear from the NPRM, that there will be a stricter definition of "unmet" need to lower overall funding requirements.
Some of the more interesting questions and issues raised for comment in the NPRM are:
- Generally, the FCC seeks comment on how it can "implement funding for the off-premises use of Wi-Fi hotspots and services within existing E-Rate program processes, what actions are necessary to safeguard these critical funds from any potential waste, fraud, or abuse, and our authority to adopt the measures described in this NPRM."
- Should Wi-Fi hotspots be treated as internal connections? We note that doing so would limit any given applicant’s funding to their remaining Category 2 budget.
- Should E-rate support cover both hotspot purchases and monthly internet charges or just recurring service charges? Should the FCC adopt minimum bandwidth standards?
- Should the FCC cap hotspot and/or service costs to a level deemed "cost-effective?"
- If total E-rate demand exceeds the annual funding cap, should the funding for traditional equipment and services supporting connectivity to and within schools and libraries come first? How should hotspot demand be prioritized? Interestingly, the FCC acknowledges that the demand for traditional E-rate funding "had consistently fallen below the program’s funding cap in recent years" — recently by half or more.
- Should the FCC "adopt more stringent unmet needs requirements for the E-Rate program than it adopted for the ECF program?"
- Are there "certain school populations, such as Head Start and pre-kindergarten students, for whom the risks may outweigh the benefits of providing E-Rate support for the off-premises use of Wi-Fi hotspots and services?"
- How can the FCC "ensure that the off-premises use of Wi-Fi hotspots and services is primarily for educational purposes?" How can the FCC ensure that "applicants are not requesting excess services for non-educational purposes like video games or non-educational streaming services?"
- How can the FCC prevent "reimbursement for unused equipment and/or services?"
- Should the FCC "apply existing E-Rate recordkeeping requirements to funding provided for the off-premises use of Wi-Fi hotspots and services?"
- How would the Children’s Internet Protection Act ("CIPA") requirements, such as a school’s monitoring of the online activities of minor, apply?
Many of these are difficult questions — with answers likely to be closely questioned by the two Republican Commissioners who dissented to the NPRM in the first place. Decisions on "educational purposes" — an important E-rate condition that was not a requirement under the ECF program — may determine the scope of off-campus hotspot eligibility.
Comments on the NPRM will be due 30 days after its publication in the Federal Register. Reply comments will be due 15 days thereafter. Based on this schedule, applications for hotspots might require a separate application window for FY 2024 or be put off until FY 2025.?