The December 3rd reply comment deadline for the FCC’s draft Eligible Services List (“ESL”) for FY 2026 drew few response perhaps because the parties who filed original comments (see our newsletter of November 24th) were largely in agreement. The only parties submitting reply comments were:
KB & Associates
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
The State E-Rate Coordinators’ Alliance (“SECA”)
KB & Associates wrote to second the initial comments of Meter, Inc. which, in turn, had supported the FCC’s proposal to clarify the distinction between Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections (“BMIC”) and Managed Internal Broadband Services (“MIBS”) — a position supported by other initial comments. Lumen wrote asking the FCC to confirm the eligibility of its own Network-as-a-Service (“NaaS”) solution.
SECA’s reply comments were the most extensive focusing primarily on the broad support expressed in the initial comments, not only to address common confusion between BMIC and MIBS services as discussed in the FCC’s draft ESL, but to combine both services within a single MIBS classification effective as of FY 2026. SECA also agreed with initial proposals by Funds For Learning and the Friday Institute for Educational Innovation to remove the cost allocation currently required for “basic” firewalls and to make modern firewalls fully eligible within Category Two. Such a change would help fund cybersecurity protection for all E-Rate applicants, within the current Category Two budget limitations, as opposed to the broader protections, but limited funding, of applicants in the Cybersecurity Pilot Program.
The next step will be for the FCC to release the final version of the FY 2026 ESL. Due in part to the elimination of hotspots and school bus Wi-Fi eligibility, and the resulting amended ESL for FY 2025, and in part due to the extended government shutdown, next year’s ESL is behind schedule. Last year, the reply comment deadline was September 16th with the final ESL being released October 25th. This year, we will be lucky to see a final ESL in this calendar year, a mere two weeks before the expected opening of the Form 471 application window for FY 2026. Although we would like to see the FCC incorporate a few of the excellent suggestions made during the comment period, changes from the initial ESL draft, which did include some BMIC and MIBS clarifications, may await FCC consideration for FY 2027, the second year of the current Category Two budget cycle.