Upcoming Dates:
| February 25 |
Extended invoice deadline for FY 2024 recurring services for applicants with approved extension requests. |
| February 27 |
FY 2025 Form 486 deadline for applicants funded in Wave 28. More generally, the Form 486 deadline is 120 days after the FCDL date, or the Service Start Date (typically July 1st), whichever is later. The next Form 486 deadlines for FY 2025 are:
Wave 29 03/06/2026
Wave 30 03/13/2026
Wave 31 03/20/2026 |
| March 4 |
Last day to file a Form 470 for FY 2026 in time to meet the 28-day minimum posting requirement and file a Form 471 for FY 2026 within the filing window. Note: Waiting until the last day is NOT recommended. |
| March 26 |
USAC webinar on the Program Integrity Assurance (“PIA”) Process (register). |
| March 31 |
USAC service provider webinar (register). |
| April 1 |
The Form 471 application window for FY 2026 closes at 11:59 p.m. EDT. |
FCC Currently Operating Normally Under Latest Government Shutdown:
The latest government shutdown is adversely affecting agencies within the Department of Homeland Security (e.g., FEMA, Coast Guard, CISA, etc.), accounting for an estimated 13% of the total federal civilian workforce. The FCC is not currently affected and appears well prepared should the shutdown continue by using existing carryover funding. However, should those funds run out, they recently updated their Plan for Orderly Shutdown.
Recent FCC Appeal Denial Warns of Excessive Procurement Practices:
Earlier this month, the FCC denied a Review and/or Waiver request filed by Child Development Resources of Ventura County, Inc. seeking to overturn a USAC invoice denial for expensive and unused hotspots. Although the funding had initially been approved under the Emergency Connectivity Fund (“ECF”) program, the decision (DA 26-138) serves as a warning to E-Rate applicants that excessive purchases at above market prices will not be tolerated. The applicant in this case had ordered over 1,500 hotspots eligible under the ECF program, none of which had been used. Worse still, the FCC found that:
- The applicant could not explain the reasonableness of the $249.99 per unit cost during a time period where the average cost was found to be $107.80 per hotspot and, in one case, listed at an MSRP of $90.00; and
- The applicant failed to provide evidence of an unmet need but, rather, appeared to be procuring hotspots as part of a 1:1 device initiative, which was not supported by the ECF program. (They requested 1,502 Wi-Fi hotspots for 1,294 enrolled pre-kindergarten students and 208 staff.)
Every so often, it is worth seeing a vivid example of how programs like E-Rate — ECF in this case — are not meant to be used.