Collapse All

April 28, 2003

Introduction

The E-Rate Central News for the Week is prepared by E-Rate Central. E-Rate Central specializes in providing consulting, compliance, and forms processing services to E-rate applicants. To learn more about our services, please contact us by phone (516) 801-7804 or by e-mail. Additional E-rate information is located on the E-Rate Central Web site.

Wave 28 Funding for FY 2002

Wave 28 of Funding Year 2002 will be released on Monday, May 5, 2003. Total funding in this Wave is approximately $9 million for 78 applications. The cumulative total for FY 2002 is now $2.177 billion.

As indicated last week, an additional funding indicator - "Under Review" - is now being used in Funding Commitment Decision Letters ("FCDLs"). This allows the SLD to release FCDLs with funding decisions on some FRNs, while other FRNs are still being investigated. Based on our analysis, it appears that some of the funding approved in Wave 28 was for Priority One services for applicants who received the SLD's March 26th letters indicating ongoing investigations. Priority Two FRNs, in these applications were marked with the new "Under Review" indicator.

Internal Connection funding is still being provided only for applicants in the 81-90% discount range. The availability of Internal Connection funding for applicants receiving discounts at 80% is likely to remain indeterminate for at least another month. No Internal Connection funding is available below 80%.

FCC Releases New E-rate Order

A new series of E-rate rules, available only in press release form last week, was formally released by the FCC this week. The "Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking" (designated "FCC 03-101") is available at FCC 03-101.

To understand the new Order, two key points must be understood. First, additional regulations may be required to clarify portions of the Order and, second, many of the new rules will not take affect until FY 2004 (i.e., will not apply to either this funding year or next). Where applicable, these points are reflected below.

(1) Educational Purpose: Under the current rules, the eligibility of many products and services is conditional on their use for an "educational purpose." Effective for FY 2004, the definition of "educational purpose" will be based on "a presumption that activities that occur in a library or classroom or on library or school property are integral, immediate, and proximate to the education of students or the provision of library services to library patrons" [emphasis added]. This change essentially expands the definition of "educational purpose" to include all on-site school or library functions such as administration, maintenance, and security. The most visible change will be to make cellular telephone service eligible for almost all school and library personnel.

(2) Duplicative Services: The Order contains a finding by the FCC that duplicative services - "that deliver the same functionality to the same population in the same location during the same period of time" - are neither reasonable nor cost effective and will not be funded. How this prohibition will be implemented has yet to be determined. The Order contains only one example of duplicative functionality (a telephone PBX and a key system), but notes more generally that functionality "may depend on the particular circumstances presented." Duplicative requests listed on both individual applicant and consortium applications may prove particularly troublesome.

(3) Wireless Services: As indicated above, the Order will expand the eligibility of cellular telephone and paging services in FY 2004.

(4) Voice Mail Services: Voice mail will also become eligible in FY 2004, although some clarification is needed before concluding that eligibility will apply to both voice messaging services and equipment (i.e., as associated with a PBX). Individual answering machines are still considered end-user equipment and would not be eligible.

(5) Computerized Eligible Services List: The FCC directed the SLD to develop a pilot computerized eligible services list by FY 2005. Since the SLD's existing Eligible Service List is already available online in PDF format, the new list would presumably provide additional data, such as actual product names and model numbers, and might be linked more closely to the filing of online Form 471s. The Order seeks additional comment on whether the list should serve as a "safe harbor" for funding eligibility.

(6) Codification of 30% Policy: The SLD has long had an administrative policy of denying any FRN for which it finds that more than 30% of the requested funding is ineligible. The FCC has generally supported this policy in its appeal decisions, but has now formally codified the policy as a rule.

(7) Choice and Timing of Payment Method: Current rules provide that funding can be provided through either discounted billing or BEAR reimbursement payments with the choice to be mutually agreed upon by both the applicant and service provider. The new Order will give the ultimate choice to the applicant, although there is some indication that choice will have to be made prior to filing the Form 471. As such, applicant choice would not be implemented until FY 2004. The FCC also codified (albeit at 20 days, rather than the current 10 days) a previous guideline that set a service provider deadline for remitting a BEAR payment to the applicant.

(8) FCC Appeal Procedures: The Order formally establishes a 60-day deadline for submitting FCC appeals. (The deadline had originally been 30-days, but had been extended temporarily to 60-days as a result of 9-11 postal service disruptions.) The date by which FCC appeals are considered filed was also changed from the FCC's receipt date to the actual postmark date (although we recommend not relying on this change until it appears on the SLD Web site). As a small procedural change, the Order now specifies that FCC appeals should be captioned "In the matter of Request for Review by (name of party seeking review) of Decision of Universal Service Administrator" and should reference "CC Docket No. 02-6."

(9) Funding of Successful Appeals: Although the SLD has always maintained a reserve to cover successful appeals, uncertainty had existed as to what would happen in the unlikely event that successful appeals in any given year exceeded that year's reserve limit. The FCC has now authorized the use of funds budgeted for future years to cover earlier funding year requirements should this occur. This added flexibility may be particularly important in setting the final funding award level for FY 2002 given the especially large funding denials this year.

(10) Suspension and Debarment: The Order provides that persons (defined as individuals, corporations or other legal entities) "convicted of criminal violations or held civilly liable for misconduct arising from participation in the program will be debarred from participation for three years and where circumstances warrant, for a longer period." Additional comment is sought on whether to debar persons under less strict standards of wrongdoing.

(11) Utilization of Unused Funds: Under a previous FCC Order, unutilized E-rate funds are to rolled-over into future funding years as of this calendar quarter. This Order proposes, and requests additional comments on, specific procedures for such funding. No actual use of roll-over funds is expected before FY 2004.

(12) Technology Plans: The SLD has long asserted that technology plans must be approved by the time discounted services begin (not simply by the time the Form 486 is filed). This Order requests comments on a proposal to codify this timing.

(13) Other Comments: In addition to the requests for comments noted above, the FCC also seeks comments on the broad subject of "other measures to limit waste, fraud, and abuse." Comments by interested parties are due 30 days after the publication of this Order in the Federal Register (expected later this month). Reply comments will be due 30 days thereafter.

SLD Updates to FCDLs and the DRT

Two interesting and useful changes in correspondence and databases were made by the SLD this week, namely:

(1) The format of the FCDL was changed for FY 2003 to include a cover sheet outlining various important procedures and deadlines, and an introductory paragraph in the letter itself to summarize the total amount of funding requests that are "Approved," "As Yet Unfunded," "Denied," or "Under Review." The funding summary may provide a useful overview of an application's status, but should not be used as a substitute for a thorough review of the individual funding decisions. In particular, we suspect that the summary does not reflect any reductions in the amount of approved FRNs.

(2) The SLD's useful Data Request Tool ("DRT") has been further enhanced to include an invoice mode field to show whether a particular FRN has been set up for "BEAR" or "SPI" (service provider invoice) payments, or if the invoice mode is as yet "NOT SET." Together with the field showing the amount of funds authorized for disbursement, this mode indicator will help an applicant to determine whether service provider discounts have been applied against a given FRN, or whether BEARs must be filed for discount reimbursement.