A serious warning was posted on the SLD Web site this week concerning violations the SLD has been seeing in the application and competitive bidding patterns of certain applicants and associated service providers. The SLD indicated that it has started denying related applications.
The following patterns and practices were discussed in the SLD's warning:
(1) Applicants cannot file a Form 470 indicating there is no RFP (i.e., by checking Item 8b, 9b, or 10b) when, in fact, there is a RFP available for the services being requested.
Note: If, for a given category of service, there is a RFP for one type of service and no RFP for other services, the applicant must file two Form 470s - one checking the "YES" box and one checking the "NO" box (and listing the non-RFP services sought).
(2) The Form 470 (or referenced RFP) must define the specific services or functions being sought.
Note: The original warning (posted 12/3/02) appeared to require that the Form 470 list a very precise description of "specific services" needed. The revised posting (on 12/4/02) added the words "or functions." Form 470 instructions give several examples of descriptions of "Service or Function" that indicate the broad nature of acceptable functional descriptors (e.g., "videoconferencing services," "high speed direct access to the Internet," or "local area network"). This should be combined with an appropriate indication of quantity or capacity (e.g., 5 buildings, 100 classrooms, or 50 users).
(3) Service providers cannot assist an applicant in developing a technology plan after a Form 470 has been posted.
Note: More precisely, the SLD expects an applicant to have a technology plan - although not necessarily an "approved" plan - before posting a Form 470.
(4) Winning proposals cannot provide "free" ineligible services.
Note: A minor clarification is provided in the SLD reference section dealing with bundled services that include ineligible components on a purely ancillary basis (see minor clarification).
(5) RFP and winning proposals cannot be designed merely with the goal of "maximizing" funding.
(6) RFPs and other solicitation methods must be tailored to the needs of each applicant.
|