Last Monday was the deadline for submitting reply comments to the FCC's Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ("FNPRM") (FCC 23-56) to consider a wide range of proposals to simplify the E-rate process for applicants and, by the same token, to reduce administrative burdens for USAC. The following is a hyperlinked list of the major filers.
For the most part, the reply comments echoed and supported the simplification measures discussed in the original comments. With the exception of a position taken by AT&T and NCTA on SPI billing, there was broad support for the proposals that the FCC is considering to simplify the E-rate program. As summarized in the SECA filing, there was no opposition to the following six measures:
- Eliminate the Form 486 and include CIPA compliance certifications on the Form 471.
- Allow mid-year bandwidth increases.
- Permit the purchase of internet from two different vendors that will be used during the funding year.
- Clarify the definition of cardinal changes to bidding documents.
- Establish procedures for the delayed transition of services within the funding year.
- Make all multi-year licenses, including technical support and software updates, fully eligible for funding in the year of purchase.
One change that would help small applicants in particular would be to extend the competitive bidding exemption for Category 1 services of less than $3,600, already provided to libraries in the initial Tribal order, to Category 2 as well, and, equally importantly, to schools. Even better, as proposed by several parties, would be to increase the competitive bidding exemption to $10,000.
Another change that would benefit both USAC reviewers and applicants would be to fix discount rates for a five-year period like Category 2 budgets are now set (but can be adjusted upward) based on student enrollment. SECA's comments help bolster this recommendation by showing that over 75% of school district applicants had no change in discount rates over the five-year period FY 2019 to FY 2023, and that there are more discount rate increases than decreases for the remainder. Our own E-Rate Central comments noted that, with the lower ISP threshold for CEP elections, the majority of school district applicants now already have the option, via CEP election, to lock in their discount rates for five years, arguing that all applicants should have this choice.
Given the near universal support for all the E-rate program changes under consideration, we anticipate an FCC order shortly, effective for FY 2025 (if not partially for FY 2024), that could dramatically simplify many of the aspects of E-rate administration for applicants and USAC alike.