Upcoming Dates:
May 28 |
Extended invoice deadline for FY 2023 non-recurring service FRNs with approved extensions beyond the original January 28, 2025, deadline. |
May 30 |
FY 2024 Form 486 deadline for Wave 41. The Form 486 deadline is 120 days after the FCDL date, or the service start date (typically July 1st), whichever is later. The next Form 486 deadlines for FY 2024 are:
Wave 42 06/06/2025
Wave 43 06/13/2025
Wave 44 06/20/2025 |
June 12 |
USAC webinar on E-Rate invoicing for applicants and service providers (register). |
June 24 |
USAC webinar for new service providers (register). |
June 30 |
Deadline to light fiber (or request a service delivery deadline extension) for FY 2024 special construction projects. |
June 30 |
Last day to receive (or file service substitutions for) FY 2024 recurring services. |
July 1 |
Withdrawal deadline for Cybersecurity Pilot participants opting not to continue in the Program. |
August 18 |
Last day to certify a CBR Form 470 to meet the minimum 28-day posting period before filing the CBR Form 471. |
September 5 |
Final day of the PIA summer deferral period (which began May 23rd). |
September 9 |
USAC in-person training in Denver, CO (registration TBA). |
September 15 |
Close of the Cybersecurity Pilot Form 471 application window and deadline for filing the Form 484 Part 2. |
September 16 |
USAC in-person training in Washington, DC (registration TBA). |
FCC Commissioner Starks Sets Departure Plans:
FCC Commissioner Geoffrey Starks announced that he will be leaving the agency before the FCC’s next open meeting on June 26th. Earlier this year, he had indicated his intention to leave sometime this Spring but had not set a date. Last week, he provided additional detail stating that the May Commission meeting was his last. With Olivia Trusty’s nomination to the FCC not yet confirmed by the full Senate, Stark’s departure would leave the FCC with a 2:1, Republican:Democratic, split. However, a three-person quorum is sufficient to take formal FCC action. Potentially, this would give FCC Chairman Brendan Carr the basis for formally reconsidering the E-Rate eligibility of hotspots, whether or not the House, in the interim, votes to confirm the Senate’s CRA action to kill hotspots (see our newsletter of May 12th).
Fourth Cyber Pilot Participant Withdraws:
With the approaching deadline of July 1st for a “no fault” voluntary withdrawal from the FCC’s Cybersecurity Pilot Program, a fourth participant dropped out last week. With a minimum Pilot budget of only $45 thousand, this withdrawal will have little effect on the budgets of the sixteen partially-funded Cyber applicants (see our newsletter of May 19th).
FCC Directs USAC to Fully Fund FY 2025 Requests:
As discussed in our newsletter of April 7th, the total demand for funds from the FY 2025 Form 471 applications, even accounting for late-filed applications likely to be granted “In Window” status as a result of successful FCC waivers, was substantially less than the $5.06 billion funding cap. The one little technical issue in FY 2025 funding, however, was that the Category 2 portion of the requested funding exceeded the FCC’s sub-cap for those services. Fortunately, the FCC’s Wireline Competition Bureau has the “delegated authority to determine the proportion of unused funds needed to meet category one demand and to direct USAC to use any remaining funds to provide category two support.” Using that authority last week, the Bureau directed USAC (DA 25-427) to fully fund all eligible Category One and Category Two E-Rate requests for FY 2025.
SECA Files Ex Parte Comments on FY 2026-2030 Cat. 2 Budgets:
FY 2025 is the last year of the current five-year budget cycle. The assumption is that the FCC will shortly announce plans for the new five-year budgets with inflation-adjusted per student budget factors for schools and per-square-foot factors for libraries. An FCC announcement on the next budget cycle is expected early this summer, perhaps prior to July 1st, when USAC will update the Form 470 for FY 2026.
In addition to adjustments to the budget factors, the hope is that the FCC will use this opportunity to update and/or clarify other aspects of the Category 2 budget process. Earlier this month, the State E-Rate Coordinators’ Alliance (“SECA”) took this opportunity to suggest changes it would like to see. In an ex parte letter to the FCC on May 15th, SECA suggested three major changes to simplify the budgeting process, including:
- All manufacturer right-to-use licenses for operating or using Internal Connections should be classified as Internal Connections, not as Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections (“BMIC”).
- On-site maintenance and third-party maintenance services should be classified as Managed Internal Broadband Services (“MIBS”).
- The calculation of all school and district five-year Category 2 budgets should be permitted to be based on school applicant enrollment numbers for the first year of each five-year budget cycle.