Upcoming Dates:
June 14 |
Form 486 deadline for FY 2023 Wave 43. More generally, the Form 486 deadline is 120 days from the FCDL date or the service start date (typically July 1st), whichever is later. Upcoming Form 486 deadlines are:
Wave 44 06/21/2024
Wave 45 06/28/2024
Wave 46 07/05/2024
The first Form 486 deadline for FY 2024, for applicants funded on or before July 1st, will be October 29th. Applicants filing before July 1st should check the early filing certification box (see our newsletter of April 29th). |
June 20 |
USAC’s Beginning E-Rate Services webinar (register). |
June 30 |
Last day to receive (or file service substitutions for) FY 2023 recurring services. |
June 30 |
Last day to light fiber (or request an extension) for special construction projects from FY 2023. |
June 30 |
Last day to receive ECF Window 3 services; all equipment must be received by this date. |
June 30 |
Last day for applicants to complete Funds For Learning’s important annual E-rate survey (see our newsletter of May 6th). |
August 29 |
Invoice deadline for ECF Window 3 applications. * |
FCC Approves Cybersecurity Pilot Rules:
At its June Open Meeting last week, the FCC adopted a $200 million, three-year, Cybersecurity Pilot Program. Surprisingly, the two Republican Commissioners, who had originally expressed support for the program, dissented on the final vote citing concerns with the FCC’s authority to implement the program. For a program designed to address such a serious issue as school and library cybersecurity, we would have expected a strong bipartisan, unanimous, vote of approval.
The final version of the Report and Order (FCC 24-63) could be released as early as this week. If so, it will likely track closely to the original draft Order discussed in our newsletter of May 20th. As discussed further in our newsletter of June 3rd, however, the draft version raised a series of questions that will need to be addressed, if not in the final Order, then in subsequent FCC or USAC clarifications. One key question will be the timing of the program’s application process, the first stage of which we would hope would not commence until schools reopen in the fall.
Also approved in last week’s FCC meeting, dealing with the cybersecurity of our national internet infrastructure, was a proposal to require the largest broadband providers to file confidential reports on the steps they have taken, and plan to undertake, to mitigate vulnerabilities in the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), the technical protocol used to route information across the internet.
FCC Streamlined Decisions:
The FCC issued another set of “streamlined,” precedent-based, appeals and waivers last week. As with past streamlined decisions, applicants facing similar problems as those addressed in these decisions may garner useful information by carefully reading the additional FCC explanations found in the footnotes. The original appeal and/or waiver requests can be found online in the FCC’s Search for Filings under Docket 02-6 (E-rate) or Docket 21-93 (ECF).
In May’s streamlined decisions (DA 24-482), the FCC:
- E-Rate Dismissed:
- One Petition for Reconsideration for failure to identify any material error, omission, or reason warranting reconsideration.
- Two Requests for Waiver to allow the appeals to be filed with USAC.
- E-Rate Granted:
- One Request for Waiver affirming a timely filed Form 471.
- Two Requests for Review and/or Waiver finding that the applicants had submitted sufficient information to determine entity eligibility and remanding the applications back to USAC for review.
- Six Requests for Review granting the applicants additional time to respond to USAC inquiries.
- One Request for Waiver involving an inadvertent cancellation of a Form 471.
- A second large batch of Requests for Waiver of late-filed Form 471s certified within 14 days of the close of the window. In total, the FCC approved just over 140 waivers representing almost 350 applications.
- Five Requests for Waiver for Form 471s filed more than 14 days late due to unexpected or serious illnesses, or to a school reorganization.
- Five Requests for Waiver and/or Review involving ministerial and/or clerical errors.
- Four Requests for Waiver permitting Category Two Funding changes to bring districts within their Cat. Two budgets.
- Two Requests for Review and/or Waiver remanded to USAC to correct vague funding denials.
- Three Requests for Waiver of the appeal filing deadline.
- One Request for Waiver, granted in part, for late-filed Form 471s.
- E-Rate Denied:
- One Request for Waiver for ineligible services.
- Seventy-eight Requests for Waiver (for a total of 82 applications) of late-filed Form 471s filed more than 14 days late and failing to present special circumstances justifying a waiver.
- Four Requests for Waiver for untimely filed appeals or waivers.
- ECF Dismissed:
- One Request for Waiver dismissed as moot for which USAC had already taken the action requested.
- ECF Granted:
- Four Requests for Waiver for eligible equipment delivered before the start of the approved funding period.
- One Request for Waiver of the ECF special construction service delivery date.
School Bus Wi-Fi Panel at STN EXPO:
The STN EXPO, sponsored by School Transportation News, held in Indianapolis last week, featured a panel with Jim Ellis, Director of Transportation for Henrico County Public Schools in Virginia, and William Huish, Transportation Supervisor for Farmington Municipal Public Schools in New Mexico, both speaking of their positive experiences with school bus Wi-Fi. A brief summary of their remarks is available online. (Please note that one comment by Mr. Huish about the ineligibility of the service for sports and activity trips refers to the situation before bus Wi-Fi became E-rate eligible in FY 2024.) A second STN EXPO, scheduled for Reno next month, is expected to feature bus Wi-Fi remarks in the keynote remarks by Keith Krueger, CEO of the Consortium for School Networking (“CoSN”). Quite correctly, in our view, the new E-rate eligibility of Wi-Fi equipment and services on school buses is generating considerable interest among school transportation officials.